Poverty Isn’t Always Pretty

8 April 2009 at 13:50 10 comments

Wrapping up my six month fellowship with Kiva, I’m not sure how to express that thought any more artfully.   On balance I’ve been inspired by the people I’ve met who, with only meager means, must spend long days at arduous tasks in order to support their families.   But I’ve also had to confront the reality that a life in poverty often means making hard choices every day.   The temptation to judge these decisions can be tempting until you realize that in many cases people have few good options on the table.

In Tajikistan I spent many days in the bazaars and was initially surprised at the number of school-aged children pushing carts or making change.   Why are they not in school working toward a university education and a good job? The easiest answer is that there are no good jobs in Tajikistan.   In a past blog post, I explained the challenges faced by Tajiks seeking to pursue an education or more viable jobs.

One day Sulton Kurbonov stopped at the MicroInvest office to make a loan payment and I had a chance to meet with this soft-spoken father of seven.  He explained that he had taken out a loan to purchase a color television set and my initial reaction was one of disdain.  You’re struggling to make ends meet yet you’re taking out loans to buy a television?

After some reflection I realized what a patronizing attitude I had taken.   Here’s a man who has lived honestly and worked hard for more than 30 years for little reward other than the sustenance of his family.   Is he entitled to allocate some of his income for entertainment?   And is he really much different than those of us who finance a car we couldn’t afford to buy in cash?

Having been overseas for six months, I missed out on many of the lesser news stories happening in the US.   This was actually a welcome circumstance.  After being in the US less than a week I happened across an article on the “Octomom.”   The what?  I was quite surprised at the level of vitriol directed at this new mother for doing nothing other than reproducing.  But after being bombarded with endless details on her, it became apparent that the crux of the issue was that this woman was receiving public assistance.

I thought back to my experience with Sulton.  I judged him because his loan was provided in part because of my efforts.  Maybe a little tiny piece of me felt like I somehow owned him or at least his decisions.   And perhaps I thought that his poverty was a reflection of his capabilities.   That may or may not be true, but the essence of human dignity is the ability to make choices – good or bad.  Immanuel Kant said, “morality, and humanity as capable of it, is that which alone has dignity.”

The greatest thing I see in Kiva and its lenders is the ceding of decisions to the borrower.   Making a loan in essence conveys a trust in the borrower and preserves the dignity of the relationship.   But it also means that borrowers may make decisions at odds with your own thinking.

A recent borrower in the Philippines took a loan to raise fighting cocks.   This is a very popular and legal activity which provides an income for many families throughout the country. While many lenders may not want to fund such a loan (and exercise their own free will through such a choice), is it appropriate to deny this borrower access to Kiva since we may not agree with how she chooses to legally pursue her livelihood?

This is one of the more difficult questions we face when we engage in charity of any sort.   Do we give with the expectation of control?  Or do we give with the acknowledgment that we are empowering others?

Entry filed under: KF7 (Kiva Fellows 7th Class). Tags: , , , .

Loan Officers: The Unsung Heroes of Microcredit Buy’em, Sell’em: The Food Market

10 Comments

  • 1. Casey Unrein  |  7 December 2010 at 09:38

    Thanks for sharing.

  • 2. Rhett  |  8 July 2009 at 17:35

    It’s interesting that so many without debt feel so free from a lack of financial obligations to others, yet so many more seek debt (i.e., credit) and obligations to others to gain the freedom to do or have such things that money can buy… You point out the double standards we hold for lending to those poorer than ourselves. Millions(billions?) of us borrow to finance our personal consumption. Should we require those with lesser means than us to beg us for credit with business plans when we just have to sign our name and get a credit card? Or, perhaps we need to re-examine our own access to credit and how its potentially excessive looseness has burdened our future generations with enormous financial and environmental costs. Maybe we should be required to show entrepreneurship and a personal business plan in order to have credit cards. In any case, one of the greatest benefits of microfinance is the empowerment of the socially repressed (often, this means women) with property and property rights. For that, thank you all for your contributions.

  • 3. Thomas  |  13 June 2009 at 15:47

    Great Contribution. Thank you! Thomas

  • 4. Dave K  |  21 April 2009 at 19:44

    I think that’s a very important question we have to ask as continue this dialogue. I think there needs to be accountability at all levels. If people are given loans with no strings attached then I don’t really think it’s a problem if they spend it on whatever they like. However it becomes an issue when a person says they want to raise money to start up a business and they use that money to do something else entirely. Interesting post.

  • 5. Simon  |  17 April 2009 at 04:03

    Thank you for this insight

  • 6. Poverty Isn’t Always Pretty | myKRO  |  13 April 2009 at 22:14

    […] a thought provoking post over at the Kiva Fellows Blog by Rob C. Here is one excerpt that got me thinking: One day Sulton Kurbonov stopped at the MicroInvest […]

  • 7. Good Thang Blog  |  11 April 2009 at 09:02

    […] customers and employees, they quickly run into uncomfortable grey area.This blog article, “Poverty Isn’t Always Pretty,” was written Kiva Fellow RobC, wrapping-up his six-month fellowship in the […]

  • 8. Lotfali  |  10 April 2009 at 10:37

    Thank you for an interesting and thoughtful post.

  • 9. LizO  |  8 April 2009 at 16:03

    I’ve loved your posts. Always very thoughtful, nuanced, and very well expressed. Take care!

  • 10. Kerry  |  8 April 2009 at 14:07

    Thank you Rob, another outstanding blog post!

    I think a lot of the attitude that you caught yourself having comes from living in what is supposed to be a meritocracy. The US is more meritocracy than many places, but it is still true that hard work and capability alone will not bring success to everyone, there are other factors.

    I am in absolute agreement with your statement:

    “The greatest thing I see in Kiva and its lenders is the ceding of decisions to the borrower. Making a loan in essence conveys a trust in the borrower and preserves the dignity of the relationship. But it also means that borrowers may make decisions at odds with your own thinking.”

    I may not always agree with a borrowers choices, but I do not wish to judge them unless I have walked a mile in their shoes. Thank you for the reminder.


Get Involved!

Learn more about this blog and about Kiva Fellows

Visit Kiva.org

Apply to be a Kiva Fellow

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,339 other followers

Archives

Drawing from the Field

Kiva Blog Policy


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,339 other followers

%d bloggers like this: