3 Different Countries, 3 Remarkably Similar Businesses

14 July 2010 at 10:00 5 comments

By Meg Gray, KF11 United States

Monica

Since I started my third stint as a Kiva Fellow at Opportunity Fund, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about the differences between microfinance in the USA (Opportunity Fund is located in the Bay Area) and microfinance in Central America (I previously worked in Nicaragua and Costa Rica). Then I met Monica, an Opportunity Fund client, and was immediately overwhelmed by how similar her business was to other businesses I saw while I was abroad.

Monica sells shoes at the Berryessa Flea Market in San Jose, California. She is using her loan to buy more merchandise so she can expand her business. Monica is proud of her business and is particularly happy that her business has enabled her to send money to her help support her parents and to pay for her sister’s education in Mexico.

José

Monica’s business is strikingly similar to José’s business in Masaya, Nicaragua. Besides the thousands of miles between them, the only major difference between their businesses is that José makes the shoes he sells. José is a client of Kiva’s partner CEPRODEL and he has been making shoes for over 30 years now. He used his loan to buy more raw materials, so he could increase the number of shoes he can sell. With his profits, José hopes to fix up his work area and his house, which in turn will improve the lives of his three children.

Irene

Or there is Irene, a 39-year-old mother of two in San Jose, Costa Rica. She has been selling shoes, cosmetics, underwear, and other items through catalogs for years now. Earlier this spring, she received a loan through Kiva’s field partner, Fundación Mujer, so she can expand her business into selling shoes as well. When I spoke to her, she carefully explained that shoes are one of her fastest selling items and expanding her shoe inventory should be incredibly profitable. She enjoys working for herself since it gives her the time and flexibility to take care of her children.

So yes, I still think that microfinance is very different in the United States. Factors like better infrastructure  and a more developed formal banking system create a very different landscape for microfinance institutions like Opportunity Fund to work within. Meeting Monica, however, was a refreshing reminder that while microfinance is very different in the US, microfinance clients and their businesses are often remarkably similar around the world. One of the most important similarities that I have seen is that entrepreneurs and small business owners around the world are generally working with the same overarching goal in mind: to improve the lives of their families.

After six months as a Kiva Fellow in Central America, Meg Gray is currently a Kiva Fellow at Opportunity Fund, a microfinance institution that provides financial services to small business owners in the Bay Area. Learn more about their work at http://www.opportunityfund.org/ or join the Friends of Opportunity Fund Lending Team to get more frequent updates from Opportunity Fund staff: http://www.kiva.org/team/friends_of_opportunity_fund

Entry filed under: CEPRODEL, Costa Rica, Fundacion Mujer, KF11 (Kiva Fellows 11th Class), Nicaragua, Opportunity Fund, United States. Tags: , , , , .

Welcome the new Kiva baby! Celebrating a half-century of service in Colombia

5 Comments

  • 1. Barbara Jean D'Amico  |  20 November 2010 at 08:37

    I am looking to get involved in microfinancing in Costa Rica can you help me get started?

    Barbara Jean

  • 2. jennyjinkiva  |  15 July 2010 at 00:30

    Lovely post, thanks Meg!

    I’m intrigued by your sentence: “Factors like better infrastructure and a more developed formal banking system create a very different landscape for microfinance institutions like Opportunity Fund to work within. ”

    Would love to hear another blog post to learn more about the specific ways that the landscape of the U.S. is different. 🙂

  • 3. Petra  |  14 July 2010 at 22:33

    Hi, Meg…

    At the “Obama team” there has been some discussion about the differences between microloans in the US and abroad. We felt that perhaps a higher percentage of the US loans are “high risk”, in that the loaner takes more risks and might more often not be able to repay the loan; than in other countries, where defaults rarely occur.

    Maybe the loaner could be taking more risks because he/she knows that he/she will survive even if unable to pay back the loan; while in other countries survival itself can be at stake; and so in these other countries the loan money is spent more thoughtful on projects that are more likely to succeed?
    Maybe loaners are better protected in the US and the MFIs in other countries have more “tools” to get their money back?
    As someone said it: Maybe American loaners are trying to fulfill their American Dream; while foreign loaners are trying to survive…

    Can you enlighten us a bit about this, too?

  • 5. Neal  |  14 July 2010 at 18:36

    Terrific post.Thanks!
    I hope you will share some of your experiences and philosophy on my
    blog. http://nealcamp-contraries.blogspot.com
    Have a happy day!!


Get Involved!

Learn more about this blog and about Kiva Fellows

Visit Kiva.org

Apply to be a Kiva Fellow

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,349 other followers

Archives

Drawing from the Field

Kiva Blog Policy


%d bloggers like this: